About Bovine TB
Testing & movements
Home / Policy / England / Harmonising the scheduling of Short Interval Tests in TB breakdown herds
This is one of the TB cattle control enhancements being introduced by Defra in April 2017 following a public consultation completed last year.
Once TB is disclosed in a cattle herd, movement restrictions are applied and the herd is subject to a series of ‘short interval tests’.
Currently some short interval tests (SITs) are scheduled at least 60 days after the previous herd test where reactors were identified. In other cases, SITs are scheduled at least 60 days after any reactors in the previous test have been removed i.e. a minimum of 60 days after the last possible day the reactors could have infected other animals on the farm.
TB reactors must be isolated immediately from the rest of the herd pending their removal to reduce the risk of bTB spread. However, the effectiveness of on-farm isolation for reactors can vary markedly between different farms, and this further reinforces the need to schedule the next SIT from the date of removal of the reactors rather than the date of detection.
The minimum interval of 60 days between two successive skin tests also prevents the phenomenon known as ‘desensitisation’ whereby an animal’s skin reactivity to tuberculin (the proteins used in the skin test) is depressed for some time afterwards. If another injection is administered soon after the first, without sufficient time for the animal’s immune system to ‘recover’, it can result in failure to identify infected cattle as reactors. It is important to note that repeated skin testing in chronically infected herds does not appear to have a significant desensitising effect on cattle as long as the 60 day interval between tests is observed.
To ensure a consistent approach and manage the disease risk appropriately, when reactors are identified in a herd the next SIT must take place at least 60 days after removal (rather than detection) of all the reactors. This is already being applied by APHA to some TB breakdown herds; however implementation of the new measure will ensure that it is applied consistently across the whole of England.
Interferon-gamma blood testing is sometimes used alongside skin testing in TB breakdown herds. When gamma testing takes place between skin tests, the date of the next scheduled SIT will not be affected even if positive animals are identified by the blood test; however additional skin testing may be required.
APHA acknowledges that effective implementation of this measure relies on timely removal of reactors from TB breakdown herds. Reactor removal times are tightly controlled and closely monitored by APHA to ensure that as far as possible, reactors are removed within 10 working days of disclosure; however on occasion delays can happen.
Cattle keepers also have the option to request delayed reactor removal in limited situations (e.g. to allow heavily in-calf reactor cows or heifers to calve). Each request is considered individually and decisions are informed by a Veterinary Risk Assessment (VRA) completed by an APHA vet. If the risk of spread of bTB is considered to be high, then the request will be refused. It is important to note that in cases of delayed reactor removal, regardless of the reason, subsequent testing of the herd must take place a minimum of 60 days after the removal of the last reactor from the affected holding. There would be a delay with scheduling the next test and an increase in the length of time the herd is under bTB restrictions.
Bovine TB is a slow, progressive disease and once an animal is infected it takes time for it to develop an immune response that is detectable by the skin test. The minimum interval of 60 days between skin tests is designed to allow development of this immune response and so maximises the potential to detect any infected animals that may remain in the herd.
From a disease control perspective it makes good sense to start the 60-day interval between skin tests from the last possible day that reactors could have infected other animals on the farm. This reduces the risk of an infected animal being missed at the next skin test and spreading disease to other cattle in the herd and so increases the likelihood of the herd regaining its Officially TB Free (OTF) status at an earlier date.
This measure will be applied to all TB breakdown herds in England from 1st April 2017 onwards.
In all cases a herd’s SIT will be scheduled at least 60 days after reactors identified in the previous test have been removed. This will replace the current practice whereby the SIT in some herds is scheduled 60 days after the date of the last test (and while reactors were still on the farm).
To ensure a consistent and rigorous approach across the whole of England. Scheduling SITs at least 60 days after reactors have been removed maximises the potential to detect infected animals at the next skin test.
From 1 April 2017 onwards.
When gamma and skin tests are carried out simultaneously in TB breakdown herds and blood test positive animals are identified (gamma reactors), these animals will be taken into account when scheduling the next SIT. The next test must be scheduled for at least 60 days after all reactors (i.e. skin test and gamma test reactors) have been removed. If gamma reactors are disclosed between SITs, they will be removed as usual and the next SIT already scheduled will stand. Depending on the post mortem and any culture results of the gamma reactors, additional testing may be required.
Prior to April 2016, TB breakdown herds in England only had their disclosing test re-interpreted at severe interpretation if one or more reactors showed visible lesions of TB at post mortem. This sometimes resulted in additional reactors being disclosed upon re-interpretation of the test, and a subsequent delay in scheduling the SIT whilst awaiting removal of the additional reactors. From April 2016, all TB breakdown herds in England have their disclosing test re-interpreted at severe interpretation regardless of the post mortem results of the reactors. This has greatly reduced the number of cases where additional reactors are disclosed at the next test. There are still situations in TB breakdowns where re-interpretation of test results is necessary; however it is uncommon.